Related Links
Case Updates
Maina Sunuwar
Around 6 am on February 17, 2004, a group of RNA soldiers arrested Ms
Maina Sunuwar, a 15-year-old schoolgirl of Kharelthok VDC-6, Kavre
district. She disappeared since her arrest. Her family members, with
support from villagers and school where Maina was a student, visited
detention centers and Army barracks to find her, but the authorities
simply denied having arrested and detained her.
SC Denies Registering Petition on Rape Case
The DPO Dailekh had already refused to register an FIR on the case on 30 September 2011 and had endorsed it stating that it was brought much later than the stated 35 days limitation period of the Country Code.
After this, a group of Human rights organizations including Advocacy Forum (AF) moved the Apex Court asking the court to issue a certiorari order to quash the endorsement of the police and issue a mandamus, ordering the DPO to register the FIR and carry out prompt investigation. Contrary to this, the SC has endorsed the case stating that the petitioner has failed to seek the alternative remedy as per Section 3(5) of the State Cases Act, under which a case can be brought before a higher authority like the Chief District Officer (CDO) provided the police desist from registering the FIR. The petitioners have, however, clearly mentioned in the writ that the case was brought before the CDO invoking the same Section but the latter had neither accepted nor endorsed it.
« Back to overview
After this, a group of Human rights organizations including Advocacy Forum (AF) moved the Apex Court asking the court to issue a certiorari order to quash the endorsement of the police and issue a mandamus, ordering the DPO to register the FIR and carry out prompt investigation. Contrary to this, the SC has endorsed the case stating that the petitioner has failed to seek the alternative remedy as per Section 3(5) of the State Cases Act, under which a case can be brought before a higher authority like the Chief District Officer (CDO) provided the police desist from registering the FIR. The petitioners have, however, clearly mentioned in the writ that the case was brought before the CDO invoking the same Section but the latter had neither accepted nor endorsed it.









Join Us